천안함에 ‘폭발’이 존재하지 않는 11가지 이유
11 signs that there was no explosion on the warship Cheonan


Shin Sang-chul (publisher of "Power of Truth"), a former investigator of the Cheonan civilian-military joint investigation, raised suspicions about the cause of the sinking of Cheonan, criticizing the report by the Lee Myung-bak's regime. For this reason, he was indicted by the prosecution in August 2010 and has been on trial for seven years (at present, Shin Sang-chul's appeal is in progress).

전 천안함 민군합동조사위원(‘진실의 길’ 대표)인 신상철씨는 이명박 정부의 천안함 침몰원인 발표에 의혹을 제기하고 부실한 구조를 비판했다.
그 때문에 그는 지난 2010년 8월 검찰에 기소돼 7년여 동안 재판(현재 항소심 진행 중)을 받고 있다.


1. 1. No smell of gunpowder.

Not even one crew member smelled gunpowder at the time of the sinking of the warship (corvette) Cheonan. It is impossible not to notice smell of gunpowder even at a small scale of fireworks on the beach or when a smoker strikes a match. However, there was no smell of gunpowder at the time of the alleged "explosion" of 360 kg of TNT, similar to the weight of 6 adults combined? In 1865, Admiral John A. Dahlgren, the father of the United States Naval Arms, expressed "the smell of gunpowder was extremely strong," recalling an explosion caused by a torpedo attack

1. 화약냄새

천안함에는 화약냄새를 맡은 대원이 단 한 사람도 없습니다. 바닷가에서 폭죽 하나만 쏘아도, 담배 필 때 성냥 하나만 그어도 화약냄새가 코를 찌르는데 성인 6명 크기인 360kgTNT가 터졌는데 화약냄새가 없었다? 1865년 미국 ‘해군병기의 아버지’ 달그린 제독은 어뢰피격 경험을 회고하며 “화약냄새가 진동했다”라고 기술했습니다.

2. No otolaryngologic injuries.

No crew members had injuries such as enterorrhexis, nose bleeds, ruptured eardrum, etc. associated with explosions. The cause of all of the deaths was drowning . Since warships resemble tin cans, more serious physical injuries occur from shock waves than from explosions. None of the "three great effects of an explosion," which are heat, fragments, and a storm, occurred after the alleged "explosion." If no crew members had injuries from the alleged "explosion," which was supposed to be powerful enough to destroy a warship, it proves that there was no explosion on Cheonan. .


2. 이비인후과적 손상이 없다

승조원 어느 누구도 장파열, 코피, 고막 손상 등 폭발로 인한 신체손상이 없었습니다. 시신 또한 전원 ‘익사’였습니다. 선체는 거대한 깡통과 같아 충격파 손상이 더 큽니다. 천안함에는 ‘폭발의 3대 효과’인 열, 파편, 폭풍 그 어느 것도 없었고, 폭발에 약한 ‘생명체’가 선체를 부수는 폭발력에 손상이 없었다면 그것은 폭발이 없었다는 증거입니다.

3. No water column.

There was no water column at the time of the alleged "explosion" of Cheonan. No crew members saw a water column from the alleged "explosion." If there was an explosion underwater, there should have been an enormous water column, over 100 meters high, risen from the air pressure of 2- 200,000 atm, after splashing to different directions. No crew members saw a water column because it was night time? At the time of the alleged "explosion," there were surveillance crew members on both the right and the left sides of the navigating platform, and they testified in court that none of them had seen a water column. .

3. 물기둥

천안함에는 ‘물기둥’이 없었습니다. 물기둥을 본 사람도 없습니다. 수중폭발이 있었다면 2만 기압의 압력이 사방팔방 확산되다 탁 트인 수면 위로 솟구쳐 100m 이상의 거대한 물기둥을 만들었어야 합니다. 캄캄한 밤이어서 못 봤다? 사고순간 함교밖 좌우엔 견시병이 있었고 그들 중 누구도 물기둥을 본 사실이 없음을 법정 증언하였습니다.


4. No dead Sand eels..

March and April in Baekryeong Island is the peak season for sand eels. By fishing sand eels in the peak season, the residents of the island support themselves for the rest of the year. This means that there are abundant sand eels in the area in March and April. However, there were no sand eel s that died from the effects of the alleged "explosion." If there was an explosion, there should have been a large number of dead sand eels floating around. Had the sand eels in Baekryeong Island predicted a torpedo attack, and gone overseas to avoid the attack?

4. 까나리

백령도 3∼4월은 까나리철입니다. 까나리는 어민들에겐 1년 수확과 생계를 보장합니다. 그 시기에 백령도 인근 해역엔 까나리가 우글거린다. 그러나 360kgTNT 폭발에 돌아가신 까나리는 단 한 마리도 없었습니다. 폭발이 있었다면 인근해역엔 죽은 물고기 떼가 떠다녀야 합니다. 백령도 까나리는 어뢰공격 예측하고 모두 해외로 도망간 것일까요?



5. No intense heat.

An explosion never fails to accompany intense heat. The South Korean Ministry of National Defence claims that there occurred intense heat, 3,000 degrees C, from the lower part of the split body of Cheonan at the time of the alleged "explosion." If so, the interior of Cheonan should have melted down completely, like the trial case of the former Australian Destroyer Escort Torrens which was sunk by a torpedo from HMAS Farncombe. However, even the thin clear plastic sheets between the cables and the copper wires on the split surfaces of Cheonan are fluttering without traces of having melted. One should check on these signs when visiting Cheonan Memorial.

5. 고열(高熱)

폭발은 반드시 고열(高熱)을 발생시킵니다. 국방부는 천안함 절단면 하부에서 무려 3000도 고열이 발생했다고 주장합니다. 그러면 호주 구축함 토렌스호 어뢰실험처럼 선체 내부가 완전히 녹아내려 떡이 되었어야 합니다. 천안함 절단부에는 케이블 비닐조차 녹은 흔적 없이 나풀거리고 있습니다. 천안함 방문 때 그런 것을 확인해야 합니다.



5. No broken light bulbs

This is the most ridiculous part in the story of the sinking of Cheonan. The fluorescent light bulbs on Cheonan are the bulbs which "endured" the shock waves from the air pressure of 20,000 atm, risen 9 meters upward to the bulbs breaking many layers of metal sheets, and the intense heat of 3,000 degrees C caused by the alleged "explosion"! At the time of the explosion of oil mist on Incheon Dura No. 3 (This explosion occurred on January 15, 2012, on its way to Daesan from Incheon), all the glass windows on the pontoon bridge, which were 30 m away from the spot of the explosion, and as thick as human fingers, were broken into pieces. The South Korean Ministry of National Defence claimed that the fluorescent light bulbs on Cheonan were "special bulbs that endure explosions and quakes," but such light bulbs do not exist. .

6. 형광등

천안함 최대의 코미디입니다. 형광등 9m 하부에서 몇 겹의 철판을 작살내며 치고 올라오는 2만 기압의 충격파와 3000도의 고열을 꿋꿋이 이겨낸 형광등이죠. 인천 두라3호 유증기 폭발시 (이 사건은 2012년 1월 15일 인천항을 출항, 대산항으로 가던 중 폭발) 30m 떨어진 선교의 손가락 두께 유리창들이 모두 깨졌습니다. 국방부는 ‘방폭·내진 형광등’이라 했지만 그런 형광등은 존재하지 않습니다.


7. No flames.

At explosions, what accompanies intense heat is flames. The Senior Chief Petty Officer Kim Soo-gil, a crew member who felt the shock more closely than anyone else on board since his cabin was beside the split surfaces of Cheonan, testified in court, saying, "I thought Cheonan had collided with another similar class warship," and "The walls were shattered from shock, and I saw the stars in the sky." His testimony translates into that there were no flames, no sea water seeped into Cheonan, and the sky was clear with bright stars at the time of the alleged "explosion." Then, how could it be true that Cheonan was attacked by a North Korean torpedo?

7. 화염(火焰)

폭발시 고열과 동반되는 현상이 바로 화염(火焰)입니다. 절단면 곁에 침실이 있어 가장 가까이에서 충격을 받은 전탐장 김수길 상사는 법정에서 “동급 함정이 충돌한 줄 알았다”며 “충격에 벽이 뜯겨나갔고 하늘의 별이 보였다”고 증언하였습니다. 화염은커녕 해수조차 침투하지 않았고 밖에는 별만 총총했단 얘깁니다. 과연 천안함이 북한 어뢰의 공격을 받은 것이 맞나요?


8. No shock waves.

A warship resembles an enormous drum. Even when there is an explosion on the outside of a warship, crew members inside have injuries due to shock waves transmitted inward. After the Pearl Harbour Attack during the World War II, corpses without head were found inside warships where there were no damages on the outside. Studies have revealed that the crew members' heads were cut off as a result of the shutting actions of shock waves, transmitted into respiratory organs, when the shock waves were slipping out of the bodies, after having damaged intestines.

8. 충격파(衝擊波)

선체는 거대한 ‘북’과 같습니다. 선체 외부에서 폭발해도 내부로 전달되는 충격파로 인해 신체손상이 발생합니다. 2차 대전 진주만 공습 후 외판손상이 없음에도 내부에 목이 달아난 시신들이 발견되었습니다. 연구결과, 충격파가 호흡기로 흡입되어 창자를 손상시키고 빠져나갈 때 사람의 숨구멍을 닫아버려 그 결과 사람의 머리가 절단된 것으로 밝혀졌습니다.

9. No loud noise..

Explosions accompany loud noise. There was no one among the residents of Yeonhwa-ri, which is close to the location of the sinking of Cheonan, who rushed outside after hearing a loud noise from the alleged "explosion" of a torpedo with 360 kg of TNT. However, the same residents ran outside when another South Korean warship (corvette) Sokcho fired at birds in Dumujin which is far from Yeonhwa-ri. The gunpowder of torpedos is tens of times more powerful than that of naval guns, but none of the residents of Yeonhwa-ri heard a loud noise from the alleged "explosion" caused by a torpedo. .

9. 굉음(轟音)

폭발은 ‘굉음(轟音)’ 즉 큰 소리를 동반합니다. 사고지점에서 가까운 연화리 주민 가운데 360kgTNT 어뢰폭발 소리를 듣고 뛰쳐나온 주민은 아무도 없었습니다. 다만 멀리 두무진에서 속초함이 새떼 보고 포를 쏠 때 주민들이 뛰어 나왔습니다. 어뢰의 화약은 함포 화약에 비해 수십 배나 되는데 어뢰폭발 소리를 들은 주민이 아무도 없었습니다.



10. No images on infrared camera suggesting an explosion .

There is scientific truth on the images of infrared camera (TOD) taken immediately after Cheonan was split into two. If there was an explosion with heat of 3,000 degrees C, the image of the sea water around Cheonan, which became warmer than the cold surface of Cheonan, due to the explosion, should have appeared in darker shades than that of the surface of Choenan. However, there were no such images on the infrared camera. Then, the South Korean Ministry of National Defence claimed that the "explosion" was a "non-contact explosion." What reveals the truth is the video images on the infrared camera (TOD). They prove everything, and this is the power of science.

10. 적외선카메라(TOD)

천안함 반파 직후의 TOD에 과학적 진실이 있습니다. 만약 3000도 폭발이 존재했다면 따뜻해진 주변 바다는 차가운 선체 외판보다 더 짙은 색으로 나타나야만 합니다. 위와 같이 천안함이 폭발의 증거가 하나도 없었습니다. 그러자 국방부는 ‘비접촉 폭발’ 했다고 했습니다.
그러나 진실을 밝히는 것은 바로 TOD(적외선카메라) 영상입니다. TOD(적외선카메라) 영상이 모든 것을 증명합니다. 이것이 바로 ‘과학의 힘’입니다.


11. No traces of soot.

All the explosions from combustion leave traces of soot. One commonly sees, through television news, that even the explosions of household kitchen profane gas system leave traces of dark soot all over. However, there were no traces of soot anywhere, including the split surfaces, on Cheonan. The reason for this is because there was no explosion itself on Cheonan.

11. 그을음

모든 연소에 의한 폭발은 그을음을 남깁니다. 가정용 프로판 가스가 터져도 사방천지 시커먼 그을음으로 덮이는 것을 우리는 흔히 TV뉴스를 통해 봅니다. 그런데 천안함 절단면을 포함, 어디에서도 그을음은 발견되지 않았습니다. 이유는 폭발 자체가 없었기 때문입니다.

원문:
천안함에 ‘폭발’이 존재하지 않는 11가지 이유신상철 전 천안함 민군합동조사위원 SNS 글 화제
http://www.minplus.or.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=4684&fbclid=IwAR3DCvgqaNT-Wvw5PY_d1AB8yzzhcbAeKY8xLCxLqtzskeNtMFYghaBdqDE
민플러스가 기재한 신상철 대표 글 번역
번역: Hye young Im